Showing posts with label Point of View. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Point of View. Show all posts

Friday, July 2, 2010

The Common Man at 5 pm

What is so special about 5’o clock in the evening? Stupid question, really. Wait, 5’o clock on a weekday? That question is not so irrelevant. The small time window from 5 pm to 6 pm is very crucial for the common man or woman. It is the time widow in which a lot of things are set in motion. A lot of people are, at any rate, in motion or contemplating it at that time. I have lived in Kozhikode almost all my life till date and can claim an intimate knowledge of the way the city moves at this time. If I do not have first hand knowledge of some cases, I can hazard a pretty good guess. So what are the various citizens of Kozhikode doing in this little time window? The little offspring of modern parents, too young to go to school, too old for the cradle is hanging on the window frame or gate of the play-school or crèche waiting to go home. His little stomach is rumbling a little and making him regret pelting his friends with his lunch, which had seemed such a capital idea at the time. The young mother of this remarkable child is running out of her office. Being a zealous new member of the working community, her bag is heavy with some incomplete work. She is planning the menu for the night, worrying about the fate of her son’s lunch and hoping against hope that she is in time for the bus home at 5.10 pm. The somewhat older working woman is unhurried in her motions, she knows exactly how much time it will take to get out of the office, walk to the bus stop and catch the bus with a margin for talking to chums and purchasing vegetables on the way. She does not pack her work because she knows it will keep, knows exactly what dinner is going to be and is extremely interested in the reality show at 8pm. She boards the bus at 5.15 pm, nods to familiar faces, purchases her ticket home; the conductor does not have to ask her where she is going. Most of the school going population belonging to the carefree age group of 4 to 12 years is already at home, engaged in a recreational activity of their choice and therefore not subject to this discussion. However, thanks to the current trend of encouraging creative and artistic tendencies from a young age, many of them would be at their swimming, badminton, painting, dance, music or karate classes and will have to be picked up at 5.30 or 6. Now the other student group living in the shadow of terror of board exams, entrance exams etc- they would be dwelling on dinner, the latest movie, the cricket score, person sitting a few benches away or some other subject of their choice which bears no intentional resemblance to what they have been expected to absorb during the past hours of tuition, entrance class or extra classes at school which they happen to be attending. These uniform clad people will then try to make their way home in whatever mode of transport is available and willing to carry them. The young unmarried working community of which I am going to be a part and the college going community which I was till recently part of, generally move about as the whim takes them and are difficult to be fit into a definite time frame. Now, let us talk of the husbands young enough to be leaving the office relatively early say 5.30ish. They are walking out of their offices, helmets under their arms, hoping their bikes have enough petrol to get them home. They are in the process of fumbling in their pockets for keys when they encounter the shopping list which has been in residence for a few days. So, they resolve to drop by Varkeys on the way to avert a domestic explosion which would undoubtedly occur on turning up without the grocery again. The fathers of the aforementioned creative children are desperately squeezing their Marutis, Hyundais or Indicas into smaller and smaller openings in the traffic hurrying to pick up their wards whose classes ended at least 10 minutes ago. The fathers of children big enough to commute on their own have not yet thought about leaving office so they too can also be excluded from our sample space. So, on a working day in Kozhikode, between 5 and 6 pm, all these people are trying to move between their respective points A and B as our math teachers are so fond of saying.
 
Now imagine what happens when the traffic gets held up on such a day, at this time. Simply put, you get a lot of people frozen in their respective stages of motion, worried, tired, hungry and very very angry. How does the traffic get clogged in Kozhikode city? All roads here lead through if not to Mananchira. Almost all buses touch some part of Mananchira in their trips. So, if Mananchira gets clogged for a sufficiently long time, the city traffic grinds to a halt. Another lovely subplot in this little tale from hell is that once you are caught in the jam, you stay there, unless you are one of the more ingenious auto drivers.Though the volume of traffic has increased manifold in the past few years, the width of roads has remained the same. Now, you will probably be tapping your fingers irritably the unasked question being – All this to talk about traffic jams? What is so great about that? Every city has traffic jams. And it is not even as though Kozhikode is that big a city. To all these thoughts, I say bear with me for a bit more. I have a point, I promise. Let us look at what happens when a public meeting is held here. The first factor is the venue. The bigger political meetings are held at the Muthalakkulam ground or if the gathering is even bigger, the beach. The space in front of Jayanthi buildings, on one side of the Palayam bus stand, is popular for smaller gatherings. These places are all, in and around Mananchira, or approachable by some road leading via Mananchira. The other factor is the time. These meeting are usually scheduled to begin around 3 in the afternoon, but due to the famous Indian attitude towards punctuality, they are invariably a few hours late which brings the whole thing into the time window between 5 and 6 pm. Ergo when such a meeting is held Kozhikode city comes to an unwilling standstill or if the event is big enough, reschedules its activities so that the peak hour gets shifted to 4 pm to 5 pm or even 3.30 to 4.30 pm.

On 24th June I read an interesting and somewhat amusing bit of news. The high court had issued an order prohibiting political meeting in public places, especially roadsides on working days. The news report can be read here. I smiled on seeing it, my thoughts being – what a humongous bit of wishful thinking. I also indulged in a bit of wistful speculation of the Utopian Kozhikode which would emerge if the idea could indeed be made practical. A few days later when the state celebrated one of its periodic hartal festivals on Saturday, 26th June, I had the opportunity of sitting at home and flipping channels. This was when a curious snippet of news caught my eye. A politician, identified by the signature white and white, and a senior at that (identified by his grey hairs) had the media’s undivided attention (I later learnt that this  *ehem* gentleman was Mr.M.V.Jayarajan) He was talking, extremely loudly in spite of the microphones thrust in his face, about the high court ban.  The somewhat censored news clip can be watched here. The key dialogues being – (a) the judges who brought out this order are absolute idiots (b) the public would hold them in contempt for bringing out such an antisocial order. Whoa! What an accurate and concise estimation of public sentiment. I wonder who he was talking about when he said ‘the public’. The public who wish there was a ‘none of the above’ option in elections? The public half of who don’t feel the need to vote? Not them, they are out of context. It is not election time – yet. The only ‘public’ who seem to fit this bill are the ones who arrive from god knows where to swell the numbers at these events. Surely he must mean them.

We live in a state which boasts of complete literacy and an extremely high degree of political awareness, but we rarely mention an equally high level of cynicism and complacency. We have grown used to waiting for hours caught up in traffic jams just because some little ‘leader’ with just enough following decided to take out a rally protesting against some news item, someone calling someone else names, a dictator being hanged in another country, India losing in cricket, America making war on Iraq or anything which caught their fancy. We have also fallen into the habit of occasional rathyatras and pathyatras and other miscellaneous yatras our leaders undertake from time to time, always at snails pace and invariably causing the traffic to be held up sometimes hours on end. We understand that there are people whose livelihood is based on attending these events dressed in the trademark white and white. They are not going to allow this august tradition, of stopping whole cities in their tracks as a show of strength, to die out just because the court told them to. The public or more popularly put, the common man, is the one I have described initially, the one whose life gets paused on the whim of others. It is a rare breed of fool who imagines that this common man entertains loving thoughts towards those responsible for holding him up at 5’o clock on a weekday. The common man’s thoughts regarding the person or persons responsible for a traffic jam at any time can be expressed as an extremely long and vehement *beeeeeeeeep*. I am qualified to say this because I am one of ‘the public’, I have been there and I have thought that and other extremely uncharitable thoughts. Mr. M.V. Jayarajan can volunteer any number of opinions in the name of the public secure in the knowledge of their aforementioned complacency. But he had better pray hard that it remains that way and ‘the public’ do not decide all of a sudden to start speaking their own opinions for a change. Ending this tirade with a stray thought – if the judges felt that the public held them in contempt, they could resign their office. What would Mr.Jayarajan resign from?  Wearing white?

Wednesday, July 9, 2008

My Language and Yours

I am in Bangalore currently, for a summer research programme at IISc and have found time to roam around. I found that if you walk along Brigade road on an afternoon you will hear at least 10 different languages before you have walked 1km. People from all parts of the country and many foreign nationals work in B'lore. So in this mix-bag of cultures, language can create problems. English does very well most of the time and knowing hindi helps; but learning Kannada might be the best thing.

I am rambling, as usual. Having put across that there are a lot of people here and that they speak different languages, let me move to the specific issue. The 'thing' that most(from my experience...but if you want to argue, many) north indians have towards south indian languages.
Here is an example-
For the background- I live together with many other summer research fellows and we are provided with transport facility to travel back and forth from IISc. On this particular day, there was some friction with the bus driver and the students as he refused to take 2 extra people and everyone had the required passes. So in the great Indian tradition we boycotted the bus and commuted by public transport. Now, I am a Malayali who speaks English and Hindi pretty well and can understand and speak bits and pieces of Tamil. The people who were riding the bus with me were all north-indians with an exception of a Hindi speaking Tamilian. After taking tickets, one of the girls wanted to ask the conductor something. The man only spoke Kannada. After making unsuccessful attempts with English and Hindi she turned to her friend and said at the top of her voice-

"Such stupid people they have here. They keep talking in their bloody language. How will people understand"
The magnitude of anger I felt upon hearing this was unprecedented. What does it speak of her attitude which is shared by a lot of people? "bloody language" indeed! What right does anyone have to abuse a language or culture just because it is not their own and what baseness to express such an opinion in front of a bus full of people whose mother tongue is the said 'bloody language'

I read an article in The Hindu not very long ago. I cannot find a link to it now but will post it if I find it. In this article the author observes how north-indians ie hindi speakers are turning out to be the 'americans' in India. The reason stated being that most americans expect english to be understood no matter which part of the world they happen to be in. They make no attempt to learn any other language. Similarly, hindi speakers expect to be understood wherever they travel within India.

I agree that a lot of people speak hindi. Knowledge of Hindi is an advantage. But I do not recognize the superiority of Hindi over my own mother tongue or any other language. My action and that of many others while speaking Hindi is purely for the sake of convenience. It is an action of choice not of preference. As to compulsorily teaching Hindi in schools and abolishing regional languages - such a suggestion can come only from arrogance, intolerance and insensitivity.

Isn't there a saying -"when in rome, do as the romans do"? Why is this so difficult for the hindi-speaking brain to assimilate? Have you seen a tamilian or a malayali in Delhi or Mumbai expecting to be spoken to in Malayalam or Tamil. Do they demand that a malayalam song be played on the radio in the cab? Don't give me any of the "It is because they are in the minority" crap. You know that is not true.

And then there is the 'Madrasi' tag. Anyone who is from south India ie who has brown skin, bathes every day and oils their hair is a Madrasi. Does this strike you as almost the same as some americans tagging anyone from the indian subcontinent irrespective of nationality as a paki?
"Their English is funny, well what did you expect? Haven't you heard that Lolakutti? All of them are the same."
All the more reason to look down upon us. Yeah right, who are you kidding? Look down on us who are almost 100% literate, have higher average incomes and better social conditions? Which are the states in which people can hardly read and write their own mother tongue let alone two other languages. Which are the states in which small children are married and girls are killed as their dowries didn't come up to the mark? South India is backward indeed.

I did not intend to start a blame game. I just want to express an opinion. In a country like India with a multitude of languages each rich in its own way, is there a need to assert that my language is superior to your's? Why cant we say that language is spoken in this state and this in the other-isn't ours a wonderful country? Why can't we respect other languages and take pride in learning to speak as many as possible. What is the need? Very simple- addressing a person in his mother tongue is the greatest way of showing respect to their language and earning respect for your effort however shoddy it might turn out to be.

Most importantly, don't abuse something just because you do not comprehend it - a language, a custom, a belief or anything else. Criticism is one thing abuse is another. If you do, it just shows immaturity and baseness. Just because the people whom you are abusing do not react, do not assume that they accept what you have said. They are just showing their better manners and your stock of esteem is definitely not going up.

This is a disclaimer: It is not my opinion that all hindi-speakers / north indians are like this. There are many marathis and gujarathis settled in Calicut that I have known for years and all of whom speak excellent Malayalam. I have met scores of others who show due respect to all languages and cultures. This is aimed at the other kind.

Tuesday, January 22, 2008

Women and Driving and an anecdote

One evening when we were out walking, my friend Swabha came up with a question that I have lately given much thought to. She said-" I have heard that women are generally bad drivers. What do you think?"
I protested against the very thought and said that the opinion was probably of a male chauvinistic origin. Being the proud possessor of a driving license I aspire to be as good a driver as my father(which translates to pretty good) and he says I am making progress. So as a would be 'good lady driver' I felt the need to defend my comrades on wheels.

The number of lady drivers on our roads has increased greatly in the past few years but their ratio to their male counterparts is still very small. So in the small population of female drivers, if a few drive badly, they could become a sort of majority within a minority and hence the cause of a generalization. What I am saying is that 'few' or even 'most' is not the same as 'all'. On the other hand, I have to concede that the lady drivers I have traveled with were not all that great at it.

There are not many girls who 'have a go' on their father's car before getting their license. Women mostly learn to drive form driving schools. And having gone to one myself I can say that driving schools teach you close to nothing. These are a few thing you learn in a driving school-
1)This is the accelerator, that is the brake, the clutch is on the left
2)There are 4 gears and reverse. Upto 10kmph in first, upto 20 in second, till 40 in 3rd and
steady 40 in fourth(40 is the highest allowed speed in most driving schools)
3)These are the hand signals but I can forget about them as soon as I get my license since I will
be driving with a.c
4)I know how to steer...with instructions
5)I will be O.K even if I make a mistake(the instructor sitting next to me has a brake and clutch
in front of him as well)
6)The H is a piece of cake. Look at the lines on the ground and keep calm...any idiot can do it.

Armed with these pearls of wisdom, if you attempt to drive a car in Kerala, to be specific let us say Calicut, you will be in some sort of a fix before 10 minutes on a main road.

What is good driving anyway? Knowing how things work is a necessary part of; it but is it all? Good driving includes not only the moving part -it is also how fast you move,how smooth your drive, how you turn,how you hoot the horn, how you overtake, how and where you park, how you stop, how you react to 'Situations' and a million other things. So, is a fresher to know all these intuitively? If good driving is a talent, only few are blessed with it; the rest of us have to cultivate it. So our average lady driver -who goes to a driving school, gets her license, employs a chauffer to sit beside her for about a month (while she learns that driving with only one set of controls is a bit tricky) and finally sets out on her own; is she to be blamed if her driving is a bit crude?

On a happier note there are excellent lady drivers also among us. Some of them are even behind the steering wheels of transport buses and lorries.

Here is what happened one monday morning while my father drove me to college-
We had passed medical college on the way to Kunnamangalam. There was a silver Santro Xing in front of us and a golden Baleno in front of it. The driver of the Santro was braking often (the red tail-lights kept lighting up) and my father (who is rather proud of his driving skills) had plenty to say. Dad never loses an opportunity to lecture me about various aspects of driving and here was '100 things not to do to a car' right in front of us. When my father had exhausted the '100...' we overtook the Santro. Now we had the Baleno in front of us and a different tutorial for me. The Baleno obviously had someone who knew their gears in the driving seat and my Dad was radiating approval. "Will you look at that guy...not like the Santro fellow...he knows what he is doing." "Optimum braking at turns...see "."Perfect speed control". etc. Once when we drew near the other car I had seen that the driver was a lady with a balding man sitting next to her . There was something very familiar about that bald head which I could not place at that moment. I did not say anything to my father and he continued in his praise for 'him' as he thought the other driver to be a man. When we turned in to Kunnamangalam at the junction and the Baleno turned in front of us, we were finally able to glimpse the occupants. The lady was none other than Elizabeth ma'm( Dr.Elizabeth Elias,Professor ECED,NITC) and the balding gentleman was Zacharia sir (Dr.Zacharia Varghese, Professor CED,NITC)...no wonder the head was familiar (after seeing it bent over our record books for an entire semester in the SM lab). My father was clearly thrown off balance...after praising 'that guy' for about half an hour 'he' tuns out to be a woman. Always adept at falling feet down he came up with "Your teacher, eh? Learn to drive like her and you can take the car out on your own." So, I got a new goal and Elizabeth ma'm got two admirers.

So men,the next time you feel that your mother/wife/sister/daughter is demonstrating some patchy driving, don't give up on them saying 'women!' instead try telling them what is expected of them in such a situation. And women...LISTEN...they will probably sound condescending but they might have a point...so listen to advice/criticism(if they don't have a point you can always discard it).

Friday, December 14, 2007

Improbable and Impossibe

Impossible is a word people use often but more often than not, I feel, 'improbable' would be a better choice.

Before the hot air balloon and the aeroplane, people said that it is impossible for a man to fly. In a few centuries time, here we are in 2007, airline companies locked in battle offering flight tickets at throwaway prices. When our ancestors said 'impossible' what they intended to convey was that at that point of time, with the technology available then, it was not probable that a man would be able to fly. Conditional on the heavier side...could have just used the other word.
But nowadays people are much less skeptic as far as science and technology are concerned.

My problem with the usage is almost trivial. The world is a funny place. There will always be freaks like me who feel that when someone says something is 'impossible'( as in you can't do it), they have to be proved wrong. This quirke of personality ( I prefer this description to weirdness) has led me into more 'argument for argument's sake' than all the others put together. On the other hand, it does make life a wee bit more interesting.

There is the yet another side to this. People(including me) say it is impossible to succeed(win a competition, pass an exam, get a decent grade...whatever). That is just a first class ticket to losing hope sooner than you need to. Saying 'impossible' is like writing the verdict before the trial. Success or failure will depend on how much we work towards our goal upto the last moment. By saying 'impossible' and quitting halfway through, we would in effect be making it impossible to succeed (even then not entirely...remember the 1% luck element). Note the difference. Originally success was dependent upon our input; after succumbing to 'impossible' input becomes nil reducing the probability of success and proving ourselves true. What a sorry way to make a true prediction. I'd rather say improbable and win and still be half correct in my prediction.

Here is my case for 'improbable'-
1) When you say improbable, win to lose probability is not 0 ie there is an element of chance.
2)You can fix a ratio according to your level of optimism and derive a 'feel good factor'
3)Who do you think you are? Nostradamus? Even he didn't get it all correct...

So, next time you feel like saying impossible, just pause and consider...